for Greater Development Effectiveness      
Home  > Country Level Activities  > Search Results
Printer friendly view
Initiatives for Zambia
Country-Level Harmonization
 

In early 2002, the Government of the Republic of Zambia (GRZ) finalized and adopted a full PRSP covering the period 2002-04, which aimed to promote growth and diversification in production and exports, to improve delivery of social services, and to foster appropriate policies for fighting HIV/AIDS, while addressing gender inequality and protecting the environment. In consultation with stakeholders, the period covered by the original PRSP was extended by one year to coincide with Zambia’s Transitional National Development Plan (TNDP).

Zambia reached its completion point under the enhanced HIPC initiative in April 2005. Under this initiative, debt relief from all of Zambia’s creditors (including IDA and IMF) will surpass US$3.9 billion over time. The country is expected to be eligible for additional multilateral debt relief as a result of the debt relief/cancellation proposal of the G8 in July 2005.

The harmonization program in Zambia was initiated shortly after the Rome High-Level Forum by seven donors in the Like-Minded Donor Group (LMDG): Denmark, Finland, Ireland, The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and United Kingdom. In March 2003, GRZ in collaboration with interested donors developed a common agreement on the way forward: a Framework for Harmonization in Practice (HIP). The framework builds on the Rome Declaration on Harmonization, the work of the OECD-DAC, and SPA. It also builds on positive harmonization experiences in the health and education sectors in Zambia. International Financial Institutions, the EC and other bilateral donors are working to extend harmonization efforts, beyond the LMDG. GRZ has decided to take the lead on harmonization.

The overall approach will be guided by the following principles to which both government and donors subscribe: (a) leadership coordination and guidance by the government; (b) commitment to civil service reform; (c) public financial management reform; (d) commitment to using PRSP as basis for strategic planning and monitoring; and (e) commitment to adoption of SWAps and possible move toward direct budget support. The framework outlines the timeframe for the implementation of these commitments. HIP policy decisions and prioritized actions are:

  • development and implementation of aid policy,
  • movement towards increased commitments to SWAps and preparations for direct budget support,
  • improvement of aid predictability and
  • development of common planning, monitoring reporting procedures.

The HIP Framework for Action was signed in April 2003 and the Wider Harmonization in Practice (WHIP) MoU in April 2004. Almost all development partners active in Zambia (e.g. AfDB, Canada, Denmark, EC, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK, UN family, and WBG) have now signed or indicated interest in participating informally (IMF & USAID) in the HIP initiative along with the government. The WHIP MoU focuses on aid effectiveness and includes an annex with specific actions and associated deadlines. These include increased use of direct budget support, establishment of more SWAps, increased reliance on government systems for procurement, fund management and auditing, use of TA pools and preparation of a Joint Assistance Strategy for Zambia (JASZ) with an improved division of labor. These activities are being implemented, even though the pace may be slower than expected.

During 2005, a new National Development Plan for the period 2006-2010 will replace the current PRSP and other overall planning frameworks. Donors together with the Government are involved in the preparation of a joint strategic plan that will lead to a multi-year strategic plan based on the PRSP 2006-2010.

Activity based budgeting was introduced in 2005 and the second MTEF is due by end-2005 with better linkages between NDP and spending plans.

There are SWAps in Health & Education. Other possible areas for SWAps are water, roads and agriculture sectors.

The EC supports pooled funding in the education, health and road transportation sectors.

Donors have entered into delegated cooperation agreements. For example, Norway has delegated its support to Zambia's agricultural sector to the Netherlands. Norway plans on entering into the same type of arrangement with Sweden. The Netherlands' support of the SADC Program on Biomass Energy Conservation in Zambia has been delegated to Germany (GTZ).

OECD/DAC Working Party has developed indicators to monitor progress on harmonization and alignment. These indicators were field-tested in fourteen countries (including Zambia). This exercise coincided with the annual survey on Budget Support Alignment done by the Strategic Partnership with Africa (SPA). Six Sub-Saharan African countries (Ethiopia, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Tanzania, and Zambia) of the eighteen countries in the SPA survey, were also included in the OECD/DAC survey. SPA has worked with DAC to avoid duplication, so the SPA questionnaire was included within the (more comprehensive) DAC questionnaire (part D) for these six countries.

A draft OECD/DAC survey report has been prepared.

Danida, EC and DG Development commissioned COWI to do an independent background study on the Joint Assistance Strategy (JAS) process in Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. Preliminary study results were presented at a DG Development debriefing in Brussels on August 30, 2005. The final report will be presented at a technical seminar in Brussels on October 26-27, 2005. The study captures the experiences (so far).

Zambia was represented at the AfDB and WB sponsored Africa Regional Workshop on Harmonization and Alignment for Development Effectiveness and Managing for Results which was hosted by the Government of Tanzania in Dar-es-Salaam on November 9-11, 2004. The workshop prepared participants for the Second High-Level Forum (HLF-2) on Harmonization and Alignment in Paris, Feb. 28-March 2, 2005.

  Area:
 
1
Donor Cooperation

Seven bilateral donors and the World Bank are collaborating with the Government to develop and implement an aid policy. This aid policy would focus on guidelines and procedures governing ODA agreements, technical assistance, debt and disbursement modalities in line with Zambia's PRS. Donors are committed to move towards improved aid predictability through multiyear projections and the use of appropriate aid modalities, and common planning procedures.

Donors have entered into delegated cooperation agreements. For example, Norway has delegated its support to Zambia's agricutltural sector to the Netherlands. Norway plans on entering into the same type of arrangement with Sweden.

Germany (GTZ) and the Netherlands (Ministry for Development Cooperation) have concluded an agreement for the support of the SADC Program on Biomass Energy Conservation in Tanzania, Zambia and Malawi. GTZ will administer the contribution provided by the Netherlands for the said project in addition to its own support.

Several donors meet regularly to co-ordinate the water sector reform and the EC-Water Dialogue (chaired by Germany).

Under the WHIP MoU, GoZ and development partners have agreed that the period between January and March will be mission-free ("quiet time") in Zambia.

Donors:
Name: Contact:
AfDB  
Canada  
Denmark  
EC  
Finland  
Germany  
IMF  
Ireland  
Japan  
Netherlands  
Norway  
OECD  
Sweden  
UK  
UN  
UNAIDS  
UNDP  
UNFPA  
UNICEF  
United States  
WB  
 Next Steps:
 Description:   Time Frame:   Progress Indicator:   Status:   Contact:   Government contact:   Donors: 
Establish a coordination mechanism around the PRSP implementation and pro-poor policy dialogue.    Joint MoU between Donors and GRZ  Completed  Information not yet available.  Information not yet available.  - Denmark
- EC
- Finland
- Ireland
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Sweden
- UK
- WB 
Rationalize the number of consultancies commissioned by different donors for strategic planning purposes, through better coordination of individual donor planning processes, and better information sharing.    Transaction costs reduced in terms of GRZ having to spend less time meeting donor commissioned consultants.        - Denmark
- Finland
- Ireland
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Sweden
- UK 
LMDG to work with International Financial Institutions (IFI), EC and other bilateral donors to extend harmonization efforts, beyond the LMDG.    IFIs, EC and full bilateral donor support extended to GRZ's poverty monitoring and public expenditure management initiatives.        - Denmark
- EC
- Finland
- Ireland
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Sweden
- UK 
 Resources:
 
2
Development Policy Support In March 2003, the Government of the Republic of Zambia (GRZ) in collaboration with interested donors developed a common agreement on the way forward: a Framework for Harmonization in Practice (HIP). Initially the group consisted of Like-Minded Donor Group (LMDG) comprising of Denmark, Finland, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK and the World Bank, but is now open to all donors. The working groups are (1) Aid Policy Development; (2) SWAps and budget support; (3) Reporting and monitoring procedures; (4) Human Resources and Capacity Development and Retention and (5) Information Development and Management.

Several donors continue to provide substantial aid outside the government budgets. The share of aid provided through direct budget support is presently small (under 15%) and is provided by a few donors. Many donors are hesitant based on fiduciary concerns.

The EC supports pooled funding in the education, health and road transportation sectors.

There are SWAps in Health & Education. Other possible areas for SWAps are water, roads and agriculture sectors.

UK will provide support to CIDA's involvement in the education SWAp.

Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and UK are considering providing support to Zambia's National Aids Council. Norway will carry the administrative responsibilities on behalf of the other donors.

Donors:
Name: Contact:
Denmark  
EC  
Finland  
IMF  
Ireland  
Netherlands  
Norway  
Sweden  
UK  
UNICEF  
WB  
 Next Steps:
 Description:   Time Frame:   Progress Indicator:   Status:   Contact:   Government contact:   Donors: 
Develop a joint donor approach to budgetary support, public expenditure management, and PRSP monitoring.    Joint donor approach for budgetary support, public expenditure management, and PRSP monitoring developed, and GRZ leadership in PRSP implementation.        - Government
- Denmark
- EC
- Finland
- Ireland
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Sweden
- UK
- WB 
Further streamline financial accounting, auditing, procurement, and joint monitoring arrangements in Health SWAp.    In Health SWAp, financial accounting, auditing, procurement, and joint monitoring arrangements further streamlined.        - Government
- Ministry of Finance
- Ministry of Health
- Denmark
- EC
- Finland
- Ireland
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Sweden
- UK
- WB 
Comply with new GRZ-donor Code of Conduct for the education sector.    New GRZ-donor Code of Conduct for the education sector followed.        - Government
- Ministry of Education
- Denmark
- Finland
- Ireland
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Sweden
- UK
- UNICEF 
 Resources:
 
3
Non-Financial Reporting and Monitoring Seven like-minded donors and the World Bank have committed to using common monitoring and reporting procedures.

In an effort to improve coordination of activities, donors have developed a mission calendar, which is updated on a monthly basis. Furthermore, HIP donors inform each other about courses/training sessions that are being organised, and invite each other to attend. A list of NGOs in Zambia currently receiving support from HIP-donors has also been developed. USAID has already joined while both the EC and Germany are likely to follow.

OECD/DAC Working Party has developed indicators (in a survey instrument) to monitor progress on harmonization and alignment.

This exercise coincided with the annual survey on Budget Support Alignment done by the Strategic Partnership with Africa (SPA). Six Sub-Saharan African countries (Ethiopia, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Tanzania, and Zambia) of the eighteen countries in the SPA survey, were also included in the OECD/DAC survey. SPA has worked with DAC to avoid duplication, so the SPA questionnaire was included within the (more comprehensive) DAC questionnaire (part D) for these six countries.

Denmark/Ireland/WB were the lead donors for the combined survey for Zambia.

A draft OECD/DAC survey report has been prepared.

Donors:
Name: Contact:
Denmark  
Finland  
Ireland  
Netherlands  
Norway  
OECD  
Sweden  
UK  
WB  
 Next Steps:
 Description:   Time Frame:   Progress Indicator:   Status:   Contact:   Government contact:   Donors: 
Complete field-testing in the 14 countries.  June 15, 2004  Survey completed.  All field-testing completed.  OECD/DAC:    - OECD 
Prepare the survey report.  Sept. 2004  Final report available.  (First) draft prepared.  OECD/DAC:    - OECD 
Develop a joint Government-Donor approach to PRSP monitoring.    Joint Government-Donor approach to PRSP monitoring developed and implemented.        - Government
- Denmark
- EC
- Finland
- Ireland
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Sweden
- UK
- WB 
 Resources:
 
4
Assistance Strategies

Development partners involved in the JASZ include Canada, Denmark, EC, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK, the UN family (14 UN agencies present), the World Bank and (recently) the AfDB. IMF and USAID are participating informally as indications are that they cannot sign the JASZ for legal reasons. JASZ is a response to the government-led NDP, with full transparency and consultation. It is expected to replace the individual donor strategic plans. The schedule for JASZ completion is January 2006.

In accordance with the MoU, a JAS working group was established with representatives from Denmark, Norway and the WB. Representatives from Minsitry of Finance were assigned to the group. This informal steering committee prepared a roadmap in March 2005 which was discussed among the development partners and the government. The roadmap emphasizes that the JAS is an addendum to the NDP (the primary vision and planning document for Zambia).

In the early stages of the JASZ process, there were various preparatory studies done. One of which included a mapping of the current strategy processes donor by donor (April 2005) and a questionnaire based assessment of comparative advantages of the active donors. This resulted in a first proposal of a division of labor among the donors for 2006-2010. This proposal was discussed in Lusaka and a final report of the assessment was issued. Draft generic terms of reference for the lead donors’ role were subsequently prepared and circulated. The Government prepared a draft aid policy in May 2005 with a revision in September.

Danida, EC and DG Development commissioned COWI to do an independent background study on the Joint Assistance Strategy (JAS) process in Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. Preliminary study results were presented at a DG Development debriefing in Brussels on August 30, 2005. The final report will be presented at a technical seminar in Brussels on October 26-27, 2005. The study, based on desk reviews of documentation and some in-country consultations with development partners and government representatives, captures the experiences (so far).

Donors:
Name: Contact:
AfDB  
Canada  
Denmark  
EC  
Finland  
Germany  
IMF  
Ireland  
Japan  
Netherlands  
Norway  
Sweden  
UK  
UN  
UNAIDS  
UNDP  
UNFPA  
UNICEF  
United States  
WB  
 Next Steps:
 Resources:
 
5
Analytic and Sector Work

The Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability Review (PEMFAR) was completed in June 2003, with support from DFID, the EC, IMF and Japan. DFID provided funding for some consultants. The EC shared its audit of financial management on EU projects and made the relevant consultant available to contribute additional research and analysis to the CFAA. The task team included IMF staff and funding from Japanese grant was utilized.

In 2004, a CEM was completed with IFPRI on the task team and financial support from Norway supporting PSIA for the report.

Donors work towards joint analytic work and increased information sharing.

Donors:
Name: Contact:
Denmark  
EC  
Finland  
IMF  
Japan  
Netherlands  
Norway  
Sweden  
UK  
WB  
 Next Steps:
 Resources:
 
This website provides practical information for development practitioners interested in the harmonization of operational policies, procedures, and practices. Although accessible to the general public, it is collectively owned by its members who regulate its content and accessibility